NBA

Lakers Ownership Drama: Buss Children Squabble Over Team Stake

The family fortune is one thing. Running the Lakers is another mess entirely.

Leo LupoLeo Lupo6 min read
Lakers Ownership Drama: Buss Children Squabble Over Team Stake
Watch Highlights

The Lakers never really stopped being a family business

The Los Angeles Lakers have always carried themselves like a palace with a revolving door. The banners hang there like stained glass, the stars come and go, and the family at the center keeps trying to hold the whole thing together with equal parts loyalty and leverage. Now the Buss kids are reportedly fighting over what’s left of the family’s remaining stake, and if you think this is just another rich-people probate squabble, you haven’t been paying attention long enough.

This is not about whether the Lakers are selling tomorrow. It’s about what happens when the old man’s plan meets the next generation’s appetites. Jerry Buss built one of the league’s great family dynasties and left the team in the hands of his children after his death in 2013. The crown jewel was never going to be simple to divide. Wealth does funny things to siblings. So does control. Put those two in a room with a franchise that still means something in the sports universe, and the room gets hotter than a summer day in the Forum parking lot.

Jeanie Buss has been the keeper of the flame

Jeanie Buss has long been the face of order inside a family that, by all accounts, can’t quite stop pulling at itself. She’s been the governor, the steady hand, the one trying to keep the Lakers looking like an empire instead of an estate sale. That matters because the governor title is not just a window dressing gig. In a league like the NBA, ownership shape affects everything: patience with the front office, the willingness to swing big, the mood around the building, even the way the franchise carries itself in public.

If the siblings are now squabbling over the remaining stake, the practical question is simple: who wants cash, and who wants control? Those are different animals. One ends with a wire transfer. The other ends with boardroom knives on the table.

And make no mistake, the NBA has seen enough ownership-family soap opera to know this doesn’t stay tucked away for long. A team like the Lakers is too visible, too famous, too tangled up with image for private friction to stay private. Everybody notices when the house starts creaking.

This is what happens when legacy meets liquidity

There’s a reason rich families spend millions on lawyers and still look miserable. A franchise stake is not a backyard rental. It’s illiquid. It can be emotional. It can be symbolic. It can be the last thing tying the siblings together after the patriarch is gone. And once there’s disagreement over value, timing, or who gets what, that sentimental family story turns into a business argument fast.

The Lakers aren’t just a team in this fight. They’re the family heirloom everybody can price but nobody can agree to part with.

That’s the knife edge here. Jerry Buss reportedly wanted the family to keep the team. Fine. Lots of founders want the dynasty to stay in the bloodline. They also usually leave behind a structure that assumes all the heirs will think alike. Most don’t. Some want influence. Some want liquidity. Some want a seat at the table. Some want to build their own table and make sure their siblings don’t sit in it.

If there’s one thing years around pro sports ownership have taught me, it’s this: money rarely causes the fight. It just reveals the one that was already there. The big checks arrive after the grief, and then the old alliances start shaking loose. I’ve watched families keep a team together for appearances while privately haggling over every percent point like it’s a battalion border.

What it means for the Lakers’ future direction

Here’s the part the public cares about, even if the family lawyers do not: does this change the way the Lakers operate? Maybe not today. Maybe not next week. But ownership instability has a way of leaking into the basketball side eventually. It may not show up in a box score, but it shows up in decisions. In delay. In caution. In the weird feeling around a front office when everyone knows the top floor is arguing about the balance sheet.

The Lakers are already one of the NBA’s most scrutinized franchises. Every move gets replayed like a crime scene. Add ownership tension to that and the spotlight gets meaner. Free agents notice. Agents notice. Other teams notice. Even when nothing changes on paper, the gossip changes the temperature.

That’s why stories like this matter beyond the family ledger. A franchise this famous is not owned in a vacuum. It sits in the middle of the league’s prestige economy. If the Buss heirs are fractured, even a little, the market reads it. The public reads it. Opponents certainly read it. Nobody loves a rival whose house is in order and whose checkbook is open.

The Buss name still means power, but not automatic unity

The old Lakers empire was built on charisma, daring, and a little Hollywood smoke. That doesn’t automatically survive the second generation. Kids inherit money all the time. They do not always inherit the same instincts. Some want stewardship. Some want freedom. Some want to keep the family flag flying. Some want the fastest exit available.

I’ve covered enough of these family succession stories to know the script. First comes reverence for the founder. Then comes a period of polite public unity. Then the estate math starts chewing through the furniture. And then everybody remembers they’re not just heirs. They’re separate adults with separate needs and separate ideas of what the family name is worth.

That’s why this one feels bigger than a routine ownership note. It’s not just about whether the team stays in one set of hands. It’s about whether the Lakers can keep that old aura of one-family continuity while the family itself is acting like a city council meeting with better suits.

I’ll give Jerry Buss this much: he understood that a great sports franchise is part basketball, part theater, and part inheritance. The problem with inheritance is that the next act is rarely as tidy as the first.

The lawyers will take their shots. The siblings will posture. The public will pretend not to care until the next rumor leaks. And the Lakers, as usual, will keep trying to look above it all while the family name does the real fighting behind the curtain.

One way or another, this story isn’t going away quietly. Not with that logo on the wall.

More from Straight From The Bench

#lakers#ownership#buss family#nba#jeanie buss

Comments

Join the conversation — sign in to leave a comment.

Sign in to comment

Related Stories