Coco Gauff China Open loss: drained after racist abuse, falls to Mertens
The tennis got ugly off court first, then it caught up to her on it.
Leo Lupo5 min read
A rough night in Beijing, and not just on the scoreboard
Coco Gauff came into the China Open) with the kind of baggage nobody ought to have to pack: the usual pressure, the weight of expectation, and then the uglier garbage that spills out online after a controversial call or a bad bounce. By Wednesday, she said she had no energy. The match against Elise Mertens showed it.
Gauff lost 6-3, 6-3 to a player she had beaten in all five of their previous meetings. That’s not nothing. Head-to-head records don’t play the match for you, but they do tell you who’s been carrying the sharper knife. This time, Mertens had the cleaner lines and Gauff looked like she was dragging a heavy bag through the second set.
The tennis world loves to talk about “resilience” as if it’s some magic switch a player flips on command. It isn’t. It’s a muscle. And sometimes that muscle gets worn down by things a kid should never have to absorb in the first place.
You can call it a loss on paper. What it really looked like was a player trying to compete while still shaking off a bruise she didn’t ask for.
The match was secondary to the week that led into it
Gauff had already dealt with racist comments on social media after a controversial point in her previous round. That part matters more than the result if anybody’s still pretending sports live in a sealed little bubble. They don’t. Not anymore, if they ever did.
This isn’t the first time a Black athlete has had to answer for a bad fan base before answering for an opponent. And it won’t be the last unless these platforms grow a spine, which they rarely do unless forced. Gauff, still only 20, gets treated like she should be bulletproof because she wins big matches and speaks with poise. That’s a cute fantasy. No one is bulletproof when the poison gets sprayed nonstop.
The scoreline against Mertens had the flat look of a player who never found her legs. Maybe that’s fatigue. Maybe it’s emotional drag. Probably both. Whatever the exact mix, the effect was plain enough: Gauff didn’t have her usual pop, and against an experienced pro like Mertens, that’s enough to turn a match quick.
Mertens did what veterans do
Give Mertens her due. She didn’t spend the afternoon apologizing for Gauff’s week. She played the calm, sensible brand of tennis that wins these matches when the favorite is off-color. She kept rallies honest, made Gauff hit one more ball, and didn’t blink when the door cracked open.
That’s veteran tennis. No fireworks. No sermon. Just enough pressure to expose the cracks.
And for Gauff, the annoying part is that this was the kind of loss she usually avoids. She had handled Mertens every other time. So this one lands with a little more thud than a routine third-round exit. It says the body was there, but the engine wasn’t quite firing. In this business, that’s all the invitation some opponents need.
What this means for Gauff and the women’s tour
The WTA season doesn’t pause because somebody got rattled online. That’s the cruel rhythm of tennis. You lose, you pack, you move on, and the tour keeps rolling like a train that never checked the brakes.
For Gauff, the larger issue is not one defeat in Beijing. It’s how often the burden on her shoulders goes beyond tennis. She’s a top player, a U.S. star, and one of the sport’s most visible young faces. That means every stumble gets magnified and every ugly episode gets dragged into the spotlight. It’s exhausting just watching it. Must be far worse living it.
The tour, for its part, ought to treat this as more than background noise. Players are expected to manage their emotions, their bodies, their schedules, and now their social media fallout too. Fine. Then the adults in charge need to make the online abuse cleaner to report and faster to punish. Otherwise they’re just handing out inspirational slogans and calling it leadership.
I’ve been around long enough to know the old line: toughen up, next match, no excuses. That still applies to the tennis, sure. It always will. But there’s a difference between excuses and circumstances. This was circumstance. Ugly circumstance. And it had a way of showing up in Gauff’s footwork, her timing, her whole edge. You could see the patience thinning.
That’s the part the highlight packages miss. They’ll show Mertens redirecting pace and Gauff missing by inches. They won’t show the mental tax. They never do. Same old trick. The scoreboard gets all the credit, while the hidden bruises go unnamed.
Beijing moves on, but the larger problem doesn’t
Gauff will have to reset, because that’s the job. The tour doesn’t send sympathy cards and the drawsheet never waits around for emotional recovery. But this result deserves more than a shrug and a sigh.
It’s a reminder that a young star can be both elite and vulnerable in the same week. It’s also a reminder that the abuse athletes absorb online is not some separate issue from performance. It bleeds into everything. Legs get heavy. Decisions get late. Confidence gets nicked.
The next stop will tell us plenty about her bounce-back. For now, the line that sticks is the simplest one: she had no energy. In tennis, that’s often the whole story, and in this case it sure sounded like it.
More from Straight From The Bench
Comments
Join the conversation — sign in to leave a comment.
Sign in to commentRelated Stories

Novak Djokovic China Open Title: No. 102 and the old order
Djokovic’s 102nd title is another rung on a ladder that seems to reach the rafters. Alcaraz’s Japan triumph reminds us the chase is no less serious.

Daniil Medvedev China Open Disqualification: Djokovic Advances
Medvedev’s gift for tension finally crossed the line in Beijing, handing Djokovic an easier path and tennis another reminder that temperament can turn the draw.

Coco Gauff racist comments after China Open match spark backlash
Coco Gauff says she was hit with an “insane” wave of racist comments after a disputed point in Beijing. The match is over; the noise around it isn’t.
